The Supreme Court of Canada held a 3-day international symposium in Ottawa from September 27 to 29th, 2000, Canadians are never allowed to ask questions to Supreme Court Justices about their prejudices. According to the Canadian legal system, these justices are infallible when they make decisions. If I had the opportunity, these are some of the questions I would like to ask some of the justices.
How could they justify spending $millions of taxpayers dollars on an international symposium?
How could they justify their pompous attitude in allowing special-interest interveners to be present in their courts, which could tend to stack a case against a defendant?
How could they justify turning Canada into a judicial dictatorship by canceling or changing 58 federal and provincial laws since the Charter was written?
Why did they allow homosexual marriages, change the definition of spouse, kiddie porn, Indians to fish out of season and Quebec to separate from Canada?
Do they feel good and secure about not being questioned about their hidden prejudices before they are allowed to take up their appointed positions for life?
Why are Canadian prime ministers afraid to use the notwithstanding clause despite many off-the-wall legal decisions?