But pompous politicians now tend to sit on the fence,
Afraid to alter the system since Trudeau’s Charter,
Same-sex referendum is now a non-starter.
And don’t you dare talk of callbacks or term restrictions,
Or possible adscam corruption and convictions,
Or the idea that politicians should somehow stay home,
And not eternal junkets between Cairo
and Rome.
The most over taxed people in civilization,
Still a million refugees coming in desperation,
Where deportation seems to be completely forbidden,
Political manipulations always hidden.
Expecting good order, good government and peace,
And if held in detention, immediate release,
So patriotic loyalists have now long been stuck,
Like playing hockey where someone up stole the puck.
Saturday, January 22, 2005
CANADA HAS TURNED INTO A BASKET CASE
Canada
has turned into a basket case haven for international terrorists, foreign spies and worse; Canadians themselves are not allowed
to do anything about it. These terrorists and spies who represent every oddball and communist dictatorship in the world are
here by the hundreds because of the Canadian Charter of Rights. They have more rights in Canada than Canadians and Canadians
are not allowed to change the Charter of Rights without permission from the prime minister and he wrote it in 1982. Canadians
are not allowed to deport activist terrorist criminals claiming refugee status. Canadians are obligated and indeed compelled
to protect, house, feed and give medical care to a never-ending line of terrorist activists.
Canada has been taken
over by a group of left-wing ideological socialists who call themselves Canadian but in reality are international socialists
who think globally about human rights never the rights of individual Canadians. The rights of individual Canadians are merely
incidental when compared to the rights of international terrorists. And the sacred Charter of Rights cannot be changed. This
clash of ideologies demonstrates the helplessness of individual Canadians.
Those who decide these issues have been
appointed for life to the Supreme Court by the prime minister. Naturally the prime minister appoints people who think along
the same lines as he himself. They do not need written instructions in order to make decisions that he likes. They are infallible.
No one is allowed to question them. They cannot make a mistake. Their words are law.
Individual Canadians are helplessly
trapped by socialist activists groups who influence the government to a degree that is frightening.
Ex-Prime Minister Trudeau and Ex-Prime Minister Chretien
wrote the flawed Charter of Rights -- without property rights.
THE CHARTER AND EQUAL RIGHTS
Before
Canada had the appointed-for-life Supreme Court, we had the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. The object of the BNA,
the Judicial Committee wrote, was neither to weld the provinces into one, nor to subordinate provincial governments to a central
authority, but to create a federal government in which they should all be represented each province retaining its independence
and autonomy.
In order to achieve this ideal federation, the Ottawa government should download 90% of its bureaucracy
to the provinces.
Unfortunately somewhere along the way the meaning of true federalism was swept under the carpet
as Ottawa expanded and centralized and taxed and spent ever more. Then Trudeau and Chretien wrote the so-called Charter of
Rights and foisted it on Canadians without a referendum.
In Canada, because of this international socialist Charter
of Rights, it often appears that vociferous minorities have more power and sway than the majority of Canadians. The Supreme
Court even allows interveners -- feminists -- to influence cases.
The emphasis in Canada should be for Canadians as
a whole -- not vociferous minorities or special-interest groups. The unfortunate side effect therefore is that minorities
and special-interest groups can foist their politics and lifestyles on the majority of Canadians. And the majority is locked
in, unable to maneuver other than to accept the unpalatable consequences. And to make matters worse, Canadians have long been
programmed to never protest. No one in Canada stands up for or defends the majority of Canadians in these matters. It is not
politically correct.
All Canadians need to be equal so that the numerous minority groups have the same rights -- not
more rights or special rights or historical rights. Equal rights for Canadians should have been written, not equal rights
for "everyone" which has been turned into special rights for some.
All Canadians should be equal before government
and the courts and all equal Canadians should have property rights. No one group -- Indians, feminists -- or province Quebec
-- should have preferences over the others.
Unfortunately there is no one out there, especially a federal politician,
who will stand up for the majority of Canadians.
IS THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS A COMMUNIST
DOCUMENT?
The Canadian Charter of Rights could be construed as a communist document because it does not mention
that Canadians should have rights to property. Webster's Dictionary defines communism as, "A theory advocating elimination
of private property". A communist government rejects the idea of private property rights just as the Canadian Charter of Rights
fails to give Canadians property rights. It means that the Canadian Government can do anything it likes with property. It
can take it from individual Canadians (ESPECIALLY GUNS) or it can take it from Canadian provinces and keep it or give it to
someone else. A graphic example of this has already occurred in BC where 90% of British Columbia will be given back to the
Nisgaa Indians and other Indian tribes. No Canadian can claim property rights (Except the Indians as groups who have been
given unequal rights in the Charter but individual Indians still cannot own property even on their own reserves.) because
Canadians have no property rights in Canada. Rights to free expression are lost or meaningless if Canadians have no rights
to private property.
Canadians comply with government edicts just as the Russians did in Soviet Russia. Canadians
turn a blind eye to the socialists in Ottawa and they in turn push their socialist dogmas From each, according to his ability;
to each, according to his need."Karl Marx. It is a beautiful statement except when it becomes government dogma. Then it is
called communism. It is called conditioning and Canadians have been conditioned to believe the socialist in Ottawa. Canadians
have long been programmed not to protest. Its not Canadian tradition, we are told. Like communism, socialism also rejects
the concept of private property. Socialists believe in the "collective or governmental ownership and administration of the
means of production and distribution of goods." Socialists place no value on property rights and manipulate the system so
that the government controls everything and individuals control nothing. This is the reason why the socialists in Ottawa constantly
trumpet the Charter of Rights. It gives them carte blanche to take property, take guns, give property to Indian tribes, tax
and spend on their socialist projects expanded government bureaucracies and a complete disregard for the national debt of
$580 billion. They want to be judged by their good socialist intentions -- not the bottom line.
Not even western Canadians,
with all that so-called western alienation, have even bothered to protest. A farmer driving a tractor on a huge field can
protest all he wants. What are the odds that someone will hear him? This is the reason why Chretien, who had a hand in
writing the Charter, has never opened up the Charter so that it could be corrected. This is the reason why he has never invoked
the notwithstanding clause for those off-the-wall Supreme Court decisions.
Few dictators in the world have as much
power as Prime Minister Chretien between elections. So why should he bother to change anything. He has just been reelected.
Although section (d) gives everyone the right to associate, the Charter does not give Canadians the right not to associate
or not to belong to a union or not to pay union dues. Union members have no say in what happens to union dues -- they financed
the June 15th 2000 riots in Toronto. It is socialist dogma all the way. This section of the Charter looks like a union boss
wrote it.
Even the UN Declaration of Human Rights, on which the Charter was based, has property rights.
http://www.mastifffoundation.org/docs/inter/un/funda/udechr.htm
Sec 17(1) Only in Canada are Canadians denied property rights thanks to the Charter of Rights.
"The inherent
vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
Winston Churchill
Our
judges tend to view themselves as gods without any flaws,
And
they're allowed to do this because they make and change our laws,
Dressed
up in bishops gowns they alone decide what's right or wrong,
And
Canadians better believe it and follow right along.
Because
the Chretien/Trudeau Charter said they could all this,
It
saved political decisions that could have been hit or miss,
As
judicial dictatorship replaced democracy,
The
elite were elated with renewed aristocracy.
As
we all stand around waiting decisions from on high,
Just
like any normal dictatorship we eat humble pie,
And
the media keeps telling us about the Charter of Rights,
Were
so proud because they keep telling us 'bout all these delights.
Because
of their strange tendencies when they make their decisions,
'Bout
marriage, cons, queers, and terrorists immigration revisions,
The
meaning of democracy is completely dampened down,
And
parliament has been replaced by a fancy bishops gown.
And
don't ask to change the system because it just can't be done,
No
political appointee will decide to end his/her fun,
Referendums
or recall are not politically correct,
No
set election dates -- snap elections when we least expect.
Tuesday, November 18, 2003
THE COURT CHALLENGES PROGRAM
The Liberal
government of Pierre Trudeau created the Court Challenges Program in 1978 to address concerns about minority linguistic rights.
It was expanded in 1985 so that special-interest groups could lobby for taxpayer funding to bring their special-interest cases
to the courts in order to push and expand what they saw as their own special-interest constitutional rights. The Mulroney
(he of the GST) government cancelled the program in 1992.
In 1994, shortly after the Liberals were elected again,
they turned the program into a non-profit organization. It meant that the Liberals (Sheila Copps, Minister of Canadian Heritage)
could be at arms length and the organization could be extremely partisan with the $2.75 million they received each year. The
Liberals, in their quest for votes had written these special-interest groups a blank cheque by giving them almost complete
access to the millions. It paid off handsomely for the Liberals because their catering to special-interest groups got them
reelected in 2000.
This whole situation is flawed because it is based on section 15 of the Charter:
Every
individual is equal before and under the law and has the rights to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination
and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental
or physical disability.
This equality section above states Every individual -- not feminist or homosexual organizations.
These highly organized groups have imposed their special agendas by turning every individual in the Charter into every activist
group.
All individual Canadians should be equal before the court and the government. Did you notice that Trudeau and
Chretien left out the word Canadian? No wonder every individual in the world wants to come to Canada to claim refugee status.
INDIVIDUAL: 1. Inseparable. 2. of, relating to, or distinctively associated with an individual.
An individual
is not a group or an organization. Is it not possible for these people to read the Charter? How can the bend the words of
the Charter to their own vested interests? Who made the decision to let this happen? How far down the wrong road can we go?
Are there any individuals left in Canada. Will Canada survive the onslaught of these special-interest groups?
From their lofty command cubicles high in
administration
How Trudeau's Charter caused our foundation
and salvation
We should believe and behave and forget about
the flaws
We should applause because it is the basis
of our laws
And the Supreme Court will tell us when to
breath and what to think
Where left is right and right is wrong and
everyone is pink
We should never critique it and stick to the
status quo
And buy their bilingualism with all our taxpayers
dough
Though they tell us all were equal but Indians
are unique
They can claim their treaty rights with our
property rights oblique
He wrote the Charter for everyone -- thats
all humanity
It doesnt mean Canadians -- it's communist
insanity
Where phony refugees can claim all their Charter
rights
With judicial justification to the Supreme
Court heights
March 1st, 2002
THERE IS NO EQUALITY IN THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS
These days, western Canadians are almost completely isolated from the political elites who run this country with only
40% of the 61% who bothered to vote. (You do the math. Figure what percentage that really is.) This phenomenon has always
been a part of the Canadian political experience. Canadians -- especially western Canadians -- have never had input into the
major constitutional affairs of this country.
Canada initially came into being as a British imperial rear-guard action
to stop the spread of the American Revolution. This left a large British army in what was then British North America. The
British then wrote the British North America Act of 1867. Canadians had no alternatives but to accept this imposed constitution.
The learning process started early.
Trudeau's and Chretien's Charter of 1982 was the next major constitutional imposition.
Canadians as a whole had no input -- no referendum. The learning process continued. The queen signed it in front of the cameras
and it was an addendum to the constitution. Quebec was the only province with enough cahones not to sign on to this Charter
because of their French-sign law.
Canadians lost equality and rights to property although everyone in the world got
rights in Canada. Even though the Charter proclaims equality for everyone, in reality Canadians got shortchanged in the equality
rights and property rights of the Charter because Indians got special rights Sec 25 and Sec 35. Non-Indian Canadians did not
get special rights. Therefore there is no equality.
The most sacred of the duties of a government [is] to do equal
and impartial justice to all its citizens." --Thomas Jefferson.
Why is the idea of equality, that is accepted by the
Americans, not accepted by Canadians? Because Canadians were never given an opportunity to accept it.
Various tribes
of Indians are now claiming 110% of British Columbia and the mentally ill federal government has signed the Nisga'a agreement
which may not only give British Columbia to the Indians but also give them an open ended access to millions of taxpayers dollars
and political independence from Canada -- all based on Trudeau's and Chretien's Charter of 1982. You might wonder how much
more Canadians will accept because non-Indian Canadians will be second-class citizens without a vote in these new and very
large Indian reserves.
And now, not to be outdone by the mentally ill federal government, the Supreme Court of British
Columbia has ratified this Nisga'a agreement. It looks like non-Indian Canadians, whos' government just passed a law that
they will register all their firearms -- may be the only people in the world who will register their guns, give their country
to the Indians and assign themselves to second class status without a vote.
A Canadian constitution should promote
equality for all Canadians including Indians and property rights for all Canadians. No one in Canada should have special rights.
Aboriginals should be recognized as Canadians in the Charter. They should have the right as individuals to own property even
on their own reserves. They should have the right to sell it if and when they please to any Canadian.
Only in Canada
they say.
Trudeau's Charter
By
James Bredin
Government propaganda holds Trudeau's Charter
high,
Can't be changed properly though Mulroney
did try,
They got the Queen to sign it as if everything
was right,
Not for Canadians -- written for everyone
in sight.
That means phony refugees -- Ben Laden if
he comes,
Four wives and fifty kids and all those terrorist
bums,
Sworn to be martyrs to make us miserable and
sad,
Thus Trudeau's Charter shows just how far
we've been had.
The document denies us rights to our possessions,
No property rights mentioned -- land or concessions.
It claims equality for all but Indians are
particular,
Their Treaty rights are special and extracurricular.
And if they claim an island, a province or
a city,
The Supreme Court will bow down and act very
witty,
And no one will proclaim the notwithstanding
clause,
'Cause Canadians think Trudeau was close to
Santa Clause.
All this is a lesson in how people can be
led,
Charter to the garden path leads to communist
hell,
The document is flawed in so many many ways,
Is it possible to go back to the pre Trudeau
days?
Or maybe just maybe correct what has been
done,
So Canadians can once again dream in the sun,
And not be confined by the politically correct,
Who manipulate the system so that they can
direct.
March 9th, 2002
WHY DO WE NEED A CHARTER OF RIGHTS?
The
Charter of Rights created a sense of dependency among Canadians. It stipulated that Canadians should depend on the government
for rights and unless these rights were written down in the Charter, they had no rights. Canadians did not demand these rights.
They did not even ask for them. You might wonder why the government of the day insisted that Canadians should have these rights
in writing if they didn't need them and already had them. Was there more to this Charter than meets the eye?
The Charter
reads:
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom
of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom
of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.
The "Everyone" in (2) does not mean Canadians. It means
"everyone" in the world who can make it to Canada. It now means that as "everyone" in the world arrives in Canada they can
claim refugee status and not be questioned about it. They are then entitled to Canadian taxpayer funded welfare and medicare
for themselves and their extended families for the remainder of their lives. The Charter therefore saddled Canadians with
the responsibility of supporting "everyone" in the world as they arrive in Canada.
There are five types of people
who like this: immigration lawyers, government social workers, international socialists, illegal immigrants, international
terrorists. We have them all in abundance. That is why we have "everyone" instead of "every Canadian" in the Charter. Our
politicians prefer to talk about human rights rather than Canadian rights. It is a euphemism that shrouds the multi million-dollar
immigration business, the planning ideas of social engineers, the Human Rights Tribunals and the politics of international
socialists.
Sections (d) gives "everyone" the right to associate. Does this mean that "everyone" is compelled to associate?
Do people have the right not to associate? Do people have the right not to belong to an association or a union? Was this section
written by a union boss?
And in the true spirit of international socialism, the Charter does not mention the right
of Canadians to own property or the recognition of Aboriginals as Canadian.
International socialists who appoint judges
to the supreme court are apt to appoint people who think as they do about international issues rather than Canadian issues.
All Canadian prime ministers since Trudeau have been international socialists. They like to impress the world rather than
their fellow Canadians. Canadians as a whole do not vote for their prime ministers so there is no need for a prime minister
to impress Canadians -- only control his party. Mulroney tried to be appointed leader at the United Nations after he left
office. Chretien tried to have the UN moved to Montreal, even to take over the US debt to the UN while Canada had (still has)
a national debt of $576 billion.
These supreme court judges are charged with interpreting Canadian laws according
to their interpretations of the Charter. We have Supreme Court judges who were appointed for life by international socialists
interpreting Canadian laws according to an international charter which was written for "everyone" in the world by international
socialists. Do they also sing the International?
Democracies that depend on a Charter or a written dogma are less
democratic. There is no need for public debate. Decisions are made by appointed-for-life judges and outweigh decisions made
by elected parliamentarians. We then get strange decisions about kiddie porn and centuries-old Indian treaties and the definition
of spouse. And we have international socialists in Ottawa who refuse to use the notwithstanding clause to control it. Public
opinion has no input as we step closer to judicial dictatorship and international socialism.
Unless Canadians change
the Charter, this creeping form of international socialism and creeping dictatorship will grow and grow until Canada is no
longer recognized as Canada. Blame Canada.
The Liberals in Ottawa rule Canada with only 40% of the 61% of Canadians who bothered to vote. Therefore the majority
of Canadians are not represented in Parliament. This has occurred in 20 of the past 23 federal elections. The majority of
Canadians have not been represented in Parliament for a long time. The idea of government of the people, by the people for
the people is definitely not Canadian. It is time that Canadians thought about proportional representation even if this idea
is total anathema to the entrenched Liberal socialists in Ottawa.
The prime minister appoints all senators to the
Senate for life. These people are of course, bought by the prime minister, and vote according to the wishes of the prime minister
who appointed them. The prime minister also appoints all Supreme Court judges for life. No one is allowed to question them
about vested interests, hidden prejudices or personal agendas -- homosexuality, feminism, environmentalism, communism -- and
they in turn decide Canadian law according to their private interpretation of the Canadian Charter of Rights. Therefore there
are no rules. They can disregard common law, case law and all previous court decisions. There is no way of knowing what type
of decision the Supreme Court will make.
The majority of Canadians are therefore hemmed in by: · The ancient Canadian
electoral system. · A socialist disciplinarian prime minister. · The resulting party discipline in Ottawa. · An
international socialist Charter of Rights that emphasizes the rights of minorities over the majority. · Appointed-for-life
and bought senators. · Appointed for life and unquestioned Supreme Court judges who judge according to their private interpretation
of the Charter of Rights -- socialist.
"[It is] the people, to whom all authority belongs." --Thomas Jefferson
