If you are a Canadian male and unfortunate enough to be involved in a sex offence court case, a divorce,
a child custody case or have a legal problem with a female employee, you may be in double jeopardy when you arrive in court.
A feminist organization known as LEAF may want to intervene in your case. They are not interested in your evidence or justice;
they are interested in pushing their feminist philosophy.
They present arguments or intervene in cases where they
consider women's rights are at risk in Canadian courts. Think about this if you are a male in front of a feminist judge while
this group is intervening in your case and then put your affairs in order because you are likely to loose your case or be
sent to jail.
LEAF claims Section 15 of The Canadian Charter of Rights as a basis to advance their feminist causes
in court. Therefore their biased feminist philosophies could have a profound influence on your case. This type of interference
could deny even the semblance of justice in your case.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before the and under
the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular,
without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age, or mental or physical disability.
(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions
of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin,
colour, religion, sex, age, or mental or physical disability.
The LEAF feminist activists used Section 15 to convince
their friends on the bench that they should have a constitutional right to be present in the courts in order to influence
court decisions. There is no relationship between this organization and justice. It is a graphic illustration of how many
leftist organizations and philosophies have come to influence and interfere with our justice system. If Canadians do not maintain
justice, justice will not maintain Canadians.
The presence of LEAF feminists intervening in a Supreme Court
case in front of one or more feminist judges would tend to stack the deck against you as a male. This interference in the
justice system nullifies section 15 of the Charter (above). It states every individual, not every feminist organization. Where
is the equal protection or the justice if a feminist judge, a feminist prosecutor and a feminist organization are combined
to decide your fate in a Canadian Court? "Whenever our affairs go obviously wrong, the good sense of the people
will interpose and set them to rights." --Thomas Jefferson to David Humphreys, 1789. ME 7:322
Do not
bet on it in Canada. Not while the feminists and their friends are on the bench and their friends in Ottawa rule the roost.
Not while Supreme Court justices are appointed for life and never asked about their hidden prejudices. It appears that Canadian
males and the justice system are helpless before this intrusive politically correct group. If you have a pending court
case involving a female and one of these groups will be present in court, your lawyer should find a way to have them excluded
from the court so that you can get justice... maybe.
I read your feminist article in the Star August 5th, 2001. Sounds like you learned everything
from Michele Landsberg. Your claim to fame is based on your father Joe Clark -- grand marshal of that gay parade in Calgary.
When he was prime minister he behaved just like his protégé Brian Mulroney (he of the GST) and no different than those tax-and-spend
Liberals in Ottawa. Your father and Mulroney (he of the GST) forgot that they had been elected as Conservatives. That's
why the once great Conservative Party is now 5th in the Commons.
If our national anthem needs to be fixed by the
feminists in order to make it more politically correct, then Canada is in deep trouble. The elitist feminists will then have
taken control of the country and ordinary Canadians, as usual, will have no say in the matter.
If you are not happy
with "thy sons," in the anthem, would "thy daughters," be more appropriate? Or maybe "thy children
of questionable gender."
One of the many ideas that the political elites in Ottawa and international feminists
fear is the idea of binding national referendums. I notice on your web site: http://www.famous5.org/ocanada.html that you
are asking for signatures to your petition. Why not put this issue of your feminist anthem to all Canadians in the form of
a referendum -- not just the feminist activists signing your petition? Then the problem would be solved, one way or the other.
Will these changes be passed in parliament some day in late June, just before parliament closes for the summer just
like the 20% pay raise for MPs in June?
One more question: who elected Senator Vivienne Poy to the Senate?
How to isolate the enemy -- Canadian white males.
Canadians are now in the grip of the finger pointing special-interest
groups who scream "racism" at every opportunity. Canadians are afraid to speak up for fear that someone will point
a finger at them and scream "racist, malcontent, mean spirit, uneducated, homophobic, redneck," or call them "part
of a right wing conspiracy." These special-interest groups speak of their love for human rights, equality, welfare recipients,
visible minorities, multiculturalism, homosexual rights, prisoners' rights, pedophiles' rights and feminism. What they really
want is power.
These special-interest groups are now in the process of spreading their tentacles deeper and tighter
into Canadian society. They disguise their intended goal -- the reduction of Canadian white males at universities by proclaiming
in politically correct tones, that their goal is diversity and equality. These social engineers in the province of Ontario
have devised a questionnaire for new university students this fall (2001). In their politically correct way they call it
an "equality questionnaire." They say they want to know about visible minorities, disabilities and financial situations.
They want to devise a quota system to reduce the number of white males in Canadian universities and they need the
statistics to push their ideas.
History has a habit of repeating itself. In the 1930s the German statisticians asked
more or less the same innocent questions to German university students. These questions seemed harmless at the time. But
then the special-interest groups -- the Nazis at that time -- found that the percentage of Jewish students attending universities
was much higher than the percentage of Jewish students in the general population. Then they pushed for a law that the percentage
of Jewish students in universities could not be higher than the percentage of Jewish students in the general population.
It was merely a quota system at the time but it was the first step in the march towards the holocaust. It was a step-by-step
process and it all started with a few innocent questions.
"In Germany they came first for the Communists, and
I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up."
- Martin Niemoeller (1852-1944)
There are many Martin Niemoellers in Canada. Canadians have been trained to keep
quiet. They are not even allowed to think about it. If you are a white Canadian male you should not only think about it
but talk about it. But you don't even vote for your prime minister. How could you change anything? Your Canadian Charter
of Rights wasn't even written for you. It was written for "Everyone" in the world. At least think about it.
The Liberals in Ottawa have already introduced a quota system for Canadians. Twenty percent of all civil servants
will come from visible minorities -- non whites. But in the spirit of loony-left political correctness they call it "benchmarks"
instead of "quotas". This hides the intent of the socialist Liberal anti-white racist plan. The 20% quota of visible
minorities also applies to management training and executive level despite the fact that visible minorities only make up 12%
of the Canadian population. Therefore the color of a persons face will be more important than a persons education or his/her
ability on the job when government quotas (benchmarks) have to be met.
What the Liberals really want and what
they have already done is to capture the visible-minority vote, and they will bend over backwards to keep it. These blatant
changes were introduced last summer (2000) while Parliament was closed down and Canadians were in recess mode. It was all
done quietly and silently by order in council in the true dictatorial fashion that the loony-left Liberals love. Did you
read about this in the loony-left media?
It appears that there is a vast left-wing conspiracy against white people
in Canada. The activist-socialists and feminists are well organized and connected. They work quietly but constantly towards
their goal -- to gain power. They form endless committees, task forces and study groups. They write hundreds of politically
correct reports for their equally loony-left Liberal friends in Ottawa. When they are in power (And they have been for what
seems a thousand years in Canada) they write blatant socialist Charters and appoint like-minded people to the Supreme Court.
They have already changed hundreds of laws in Canada -- judicial dictatorship -- no input from the Canadian public. The
famous Canadian Charter of Rights does not allow the right to own property or the right to equal treatment in employment by
the Canadian government. The majority of Canadians are left out of this socialist circle. The socialist Charter was imposed
without a referendum. Canadians did not complain. They were told to celebrate and they did.
Already in
some areas of Toronto, whites are in a minority and if the trend continues, encouraged by massive out-of-control immigration
from the Third World, whites will soon be a minority in Canada.
This of course is only the first step in discrimination
and segregation by the federal government. They have other ideas in their secret agendas that will be introduced if no one
stands up to defend equal rights for all Canadians in employment and promotions. All employers should be blind to color.
You are now reading the only summer-time opposition to the Liberals in Ottawa.
What could the Ottawa
Liberals think of next? Maybe the whites will soon have to go to the back of the bus if the trend continues. Maybe the percentage
of whites males attending universities will have to go on the quota system. The questionnaires are already printed. The
statistics will be ready soon. The rules are on the way. Whites are quite obvious by their white skin. They are easily
pushed around and manipulated by the Ottawa government, if it is done in the proper manner. Therefore there will be no need
for white Canadians to wear armbands. That should make Canadians happy.
This dictum came out of the Soviet Union
at the height of the Stalinist era. Do not think and if you do, do not say. Do not write it and if you do, do not
mail it. Do not sign it and if you do, get it back.
The silence of the majority of Canadians is what the Ottawa
Liberals love. And unfortunately they have it.
